One of the most popular history channel series at the moment called Vikings is loosely based on the Norse saga known as the Saga of Ragnar Lodbrok, a sequel to the Völsung Saga. As for the show itself, it is well-cast and well-acted one. Even though some praise the series for the high-quality acting, others such as historians find this television show inaccurate in factual terms.
Ragnar Was Swedish
According to the show, Ragnar was a Norseman, but he was nothing like that for his origin was Swedish i.e. he was the son of the Swedish king Sigmund Hering. He also had some Danish origins, because he was a relative of the Danish king Gudfred. It is widely held and known that all of the Ragnar Lodbrok’s sons were actual historical figures (Halfdan Ragnarsson, Sigurd Snake-in-the-Eye, Björn Ironside, Ubba and Ivar the Boneless), but there are no factual proofs that Ragnar actually existed. Even if he did exist, he might not have been called Ragnar whatsoever. What’s for sure is that the deeds of this famous Viking coincide with the deeds of many other Viking rulers and heroes.
The Timeline of the Series Is Messed Up
In the series, Ragnar is depicted as a man in his mid-late twenties. He is portrayed as the leader of the raid on Lindisfarne, an island off the northern coast of England. Ragnar Lothbrok, the historical figure, happened to invade this island 50 years later. Therefore, he would have to be an elderly man in his seventies, because it was in the 840’s that he and his Viking fleet invaded and sacked Paris. Taking the historical period into consideration, it is highly unlikely that he was 90 years old when he died in Northumbria. Except in rare cases, no man lived that long 1000 years ago.
The Storyline Is Not Completely Based on the Historical Facts
The series also got it wrong when it comes to one another “line”. According to the show storyline, Ragnar discovers the unexplored parts of the world, i.e the North Sea, in order to raid England. Ragnar becomes the groundbreaker who explores the unexplored lands to the west, which the Vikings are even unaware of. Unfortunately, this is not in line with the historical truth. Scandinavian seamen are known to have been sailing to the west and raiding the British isles since the Roman era. There is no doubt that Ragnar and his people were acquainted with the English lands and people because the English themselves had confronted the Vikings in the 5th and 6th century AD in pursuit of conquering their lands.
Combat Styles and Armor Items Were Different
In the show, the Vikings are prone to using swords as their primary weapon. The history shows that the Vikings used shields as their primary weapon, and swords as their secondary weapon. Even though the sword is the major damage dealer, it was rarely used on its own. The Vikings age demanded a shield-bind combat, and blade-on-blade contacts were uncommon at the time. They either used only shields, or shields and swords concurrently. When it comes to armor, the show portrays the Viking warriors with the lack of armor. The Vikings wore shirts of leather or mail in battle, and iron helmets, as well. Apart from the enemies of Vikings, these warriors are presented bareheaded, which was not the case.
Chieftains Were Not Privileged
As pictured in the Vikings series, the jarl is the one who has control over the Thing. In the series, the jarl owning the Thing is depicted as a despot who thinks he is more important than his fellowmen. But, in reality, this behaviour of the jarl would never have been tolerated. On the contrary, one of the Viking laws stated that chieftains who had too much power or were too arrogant had to be disobeyed.