5 Things The History Channel’s “Vikings” Got Terribly Wrong

The series's timeline does not match with the historical chain of events. Credits: Winchester University History Student's Blog

The series’s timeline does not match with the historical chain of events. Credits: Winchester University History Student’s Blog

The Timeline of the Series Is Messed Up

In the series, Ragnar is depicted as a man in his mid-late twenties. He is portrayed as the leader of the raid on Lindisfarne, an island off the northern coast of England. Ragnar Lothbrok, the historical figure, happened to invade this island 50 years later. Therefore, he would have to be an elderly man in his seventies, because it was in the 840’s that he and his Viking fleet invaded and sacked Paris. Taking the historical period into consideration, it is highly unlikely that he was 90 years old when he died in Northumbria. Except in rare cases, no man lived that long 1000 years ago.

Related Posts

6 Evilest Rulers of Ancient History It is said that with great power comes great responsibility. The people on this list definitely had a lot of power, but they were the furthest thing from responsible. Keep reading to learn m...
7 Shocking Facts About Attila That Justified His Nickname the Scourge of God Attila the Hun terrorized the whole Europe for about 20 years and by the time of his death he was known as The Scourge of God. If you ever wondered why, here are some reasons why his brutali...
Death of King Leonidas: 300 and What It Got Wrong Most of us know about King Leonidas because of the actor Gerard Butler who played him in the movie 300. In reality, he was a significant figure in Greek history, and this article will hopefu...

What do you think?


Pin It on Pinterest